Job:
#TRT-1501issue7 weeks agoNetPol tests may not be recording results correctly? In Progress
Issue 15799618: NetPol tests may not be recording results correctly?
Description: On https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/test-platform-results/logs/aggregated-gcp-ovn-upgrade-4.15-micro-release-openshift-release-analysis-aggregator/1756168710529224704 we failed three netpol tests on just one result, failure, with no successess. However the other 9 jobs seemed to run fine.
 
 [sig-network] Netpol NetworkPolicy between server and client should allow ingress access from namespace on one named port [Feature:NetworkPolicy] [Skipped:Network/OVNKubernetes] [Skipped:Network/OpenShiftSDN/Multitenant] [Skipped:Network/OpenShiftSDN] [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel] [Suite:k8s]
 
 [sig-network] Netpol NetworkPolicy between server and client should allow egress access on one named port [Feature:NetworkPolicy] [Skipped:Network/OVNKubernetes] [Skipped:Network/OpenShiftSDN/Multitenant] [Skipped:Network/OpenShiftSDN] [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel] [Suite:k8s]
 
 [sig-network] Netpol NetworkPolicy between server and client should allow ingress access on one named port [Feature:NetworkPolicy] [Skipped:Network/OVNKubernetes] [Skipped:Network/OpenShiftSDN/Multitenant] [Skipped:Network/OpenShiftSDN] [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel] [Suite:k8s]
 
 Something seems funky with these tests, they're barely running, they don't seem to consistently report results. [4.15 has just 3 runs in the last two weeks|https://sippy.dptools.openshift.org/sippy-ng/tests/4.15/analysis?test=%5Bsig-network%5D%20Netpol%20NetworkPolicy%20between%20server%20and%20client%20should%20allow%20ingress%20access%20from%20namespace%20on%20one%20named%20port%20%5BFeature%3ANetworkPolicy%5D%20%5BSkipped%3ANetwork%2FOVNKubernetes%5D%20%5BSkipped%3ANetwork%2FOpenShiftSDN%2FMultitenant%5D%20%5BSkipped%3ANetwork%2FOpenShiftSDN%5D%20%5BSuite%3Aopenshift%2Fconformance%2Fparallel%5D%20%5BSuite%3Ak8s%5D&filters=%7B%22items%22%3A%5B%7B%22columnField%22%3A%22name%22%2C%22operatorValue%22%3A%22equals%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22%5Bsig-network%5D%20Netpol%20NetworkPolicy%20between%20server%20and%20client%20should%20allow%20ingress%20access%20from%20namespace%20on%20one%20named%20port%20%5BFeature%3ANetworkPolicy%5D%20%5BSkipped%3ANetwork%2FOVNKubernetes%5D%20%5BSkipped%3ANetwork%2FOpenShiftSDN%2FMultitenant%5D%20%5BSkipped%3ANetwork%2FOpenShiftSDN%5D%20%5BSuite%3Aopenshift%2Fconformance%2Fparallel%5D%20%5BSuite%3Ak8s%5D%22%7D%5D%2C%22linkOperator%22%3A%22and%22%7D], however [4.16 has just 1 but it passed|https://sippy.dptools.openshift.org/sippy-ng/tests/4.16/analysis?test=%5Bsig-network%5D%20Netpol%20NetworkPolicy%20between%20server%20and%20client%20should%20allow%20ingress%20access%20from%20namespace%20on%20one%20named%20port%20%5BFeature%3ANetworkPolicy%5D%20%5BSkipped%3ANetwork%2FOVNKubernetes%5D%20%5BSkipped%3ANetwork%2FOpenShiftSDN%2FMultitenant%5D%20%5BSkipped%3ANetwork%2FOpenShiftSDN%5D%20%5BSuite%3Aopenshift%2Fconformance%2Fparallel%5D%20%5BSuite%3Ak8s%5D&filters=%7B%22items%22%3A%5B%7B%22columnField%22%3A%22name%22%2C%22operatorValue%22%3A%22equals%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22%5Bsig-network%5D%20Netpol%20NetworkPolicy%20between%20server%20and%20client%20should%20allow%20ingress%20access%20from%20namespace%20on%20one%20named%20port%20%5BFeature%3ANetworkPolicy%5D%20%5BSkipped%3ANetwork%2FOVNKubernetes%5D%20%5BSkipped%3ANetwork%2FOpenShiftSDN%2FMultitenant%5D%20%5BSkipped%3ANetwork%2FOpenShiftSDN%5D%20%5BSuite%3Aopenshift%2Fconformance%2Fparallel%5D%20%5BSuite%3Ak8s%5D%22%7D%5D%2C%22linkOperator%22%3A%22and%22%7D]
 
 Whatever's going on, it's capable of taking out a payload, though it's not happening 100% of the time. https://amd64.ocp.releases.ci.openshift.org/releasestream/4.15.0-0.ci/release/4.15.0-0.ci-2024-02-10-040857
Status: In Progress
periodic-ci-openshift-multiarch-master-nightly-4.13-ocp-e2e-aws-ovn-arm64-techpreview (all) - 33 runs, 24% failed, 13% of failures match = 3% impact
#1780833575113854976junit11 days ago
# [sig-network] NetworkPolicyLegacy [LinuxOnly] NetworkPolicy between server and client should enforce policy based on PodSelector and NamespaceSelector [Feature:NetworkPolicy] [Skipped:Network/OpenShiftSDN/Multitenant] [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel] [Suite:k8s]
fail [k8s.io/kubernetes@v1.26.1/test/e2e/network/netpol/network_legacy.go:1957]: Apr 18 06:19:49.949: Pod client-a-6slbb should not be able to connect to service svc-server, but was able to connect.
#1780833575113854976junit11 days ago
Apr 18 06:19:18.540 E ns/e2e-job-7214 pod/pod-failure-failjob-kwbqj node/ip-10-0-227-240.us-west-2.compute.internal uid/7fc91bb3-fda9-4368-9387-6fc455988604 reason/Failed ():
Apr 18 06:19:22.845 - 28s   E e2e-test/"[sig-network] NetworkPolicyLegacy [LinuxOnly] NetworkPolicy between server and client should enforce policy based on PodSelector and NamespaceSelector [Feature:NetworkPolicy] [Skipped:Network/OpenShiftSDN/Multitenant] [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel] [Suite:k8s]" e2e test finished As "Failed"
Apr 18 06:19:32.228 E ns/e2e-port-forwarding-2737 pod/pfpod node/ip-10-0-133-1.us-west-2.compute.internal uid/05b82e7a-b7dd-426d-9bf4-92f4105f6e10 container/portforwardtester reason/ContainerExit code/4 cause/Error
#1780833575113854976junit11 days ago
Apr 18 06:19:50.889 E ns/e2e-kubelet-etc-hosts-4784 pod/test-host-network-pod node/ip-10-0-133-1.us-west-2.compute.internal uid/8ba02758-7459-4076-9b98-99b950060475 container/busybox-1 reason/ContainerExit code/2 cause/Error
Apr 18 06:19:51.255 E e2e-test/"[sig-network] NetworkPolicyLegacy [LinuxOnly] NetworkPolicy between server and client should enforce policy based on PodSelector and NamespaceSelector [Feature:NetworkPolicy] [Skipped:Network/OpenShiftSDN/Multitenant] [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel] [Suite:k8s]" finishedStatus/Failed
Apr 18 06:19:51.577 E ns/e2e-network-policy-4169 pod/server-vj99l node/ip-10-0-182-237.us-west-2.compute.internal uid/e4f61304-65c5-4947-9c37-fe2d6f9afe9a container/server-container-81 reason/ContainerExit code/2 cause/Error

Found in 3.03% of runs (12.50% of failures) across 33 total runs and 1 jobs (24.24% failed) in 494ms - clear search | chart view - source code located on github